Continuing Healthcare – Public and Staff Experiences

What we set out to achieve

An image of an older woman being cared for by a younger carer.

We gathered feedback from members of the public who either personally receive, or care for someone who receives, Continuing Healthcare (CHC) funding, including those with a Personal Health Budget or Funded Nursing Care in a registered care home.

We also engaged with staff across the system who support the CHC process, with separate reports produced for public and staff perspectives

This engagement formed part of a wider programme of work involving Continuing Healthcare, Adult Social Care, and partner organisations across Lincolnshire to take a deeper look at the CHC journey.

The aim was not only to review processes, but to better understand the lived experience of those involved and help shape a system that is more personal, compassionate, and connected.

What we did

Between 23 October 2025 and 12 January 2026, we launched a county-wide public survey and received a total of 62 public responses and received a total of 42 responses to the staff survey.

Here is how we reached the public and staff:-

• The survey questions were co-produced with the Personalisation Team, Adult Social Care and the Continuing Healthcare Team.

• Questions were developed ensuring that we captured individuals, families, carers and staff experiences across the whole continuing healthcare pathway.

• Posters with QR codes and links to the survey were sent to a wide variety of individuals and groups including:-

  • Primary care.
  • Hospital trusts within Lincolnshire and out of area where patients may receive care.
  • Lincolnshire County Council.
  • Voluntary and community sectors.
  • Community Connectors in Lincolnshire.
  • Lincolnshire Care Association.
  • Healthwatch.
  • Public Health Officers.
  • Distributed to groups from our extensive stakeholder database.

• The engagement was promoted through social media, newsletters and web-sites.

What you told us

• Many people were unclear about what CHC is and what they are entitled to, particularly Personal Health Budgets. Those who did have a Personal Health Budgets described it as very positive.

• Information before assessments was often poor or missing, with many people only learning about CHC during a hospital stay which caused confusion and anxiety.

• Experiences of the CHC checklist assessment were mixed; people valued being treated with dignity but wanted clearer explanations, more time and greater opportunity to share what mattered to them.

• The Decision Support Tool (DST) process caused the most dissatisfaction, with people feeling meetings were long, stressful and that their views were not always fully heard or understood.

• Communication about decisions and next steps was unclear, with many people unsure about outcomes, available choices or what would happen next.

• Most people were not meaningfully involved in care and support planning, and many felt their personal priorities were not reflected in plans.

• Awareness of how to make a complaint was low, and while some found the process easy, delays in responses caused frustration.

• Positive experiences were linked to good communication and compassionate staff, particularly GPs and multidisciplinary teams who listened and worked collaboratively.

These themes reflect a strong desire for a more transparent, person centred, and supportive CHC experience.

The difference it’s made

• Feedback has informed ongoing CHC process review with findings shared with the CHC Process Mapping Group.
• It reinforced the need for more person centred, compassionate care, prompting reflection and a move away from process driven approaches.
• Clear opportunities for improvement were identified, including better communication, clearer information and earlier involvement of people and families.
• Feedback has shaped practical improvement activity, such as pilots, training, simplified processes and improved communication materials.
• It laid the foundations for future co production with plans to involve people with lived experience through a CHC Co Production Group from 2026/27.

This programme of work is still ongoing so be sure to check back for more up-dates on how your feedback has made a difference.

What’s next?

Feedback from public and staff engagement highlights a shared commitment to delivering high quality Continuing Healthcare (CHC) in Lincolnshire, alongside clear areas for improvements. Moving forward, priorities include:-

• Enhancing communication.
• Strengthening personalised care.
• Improving co-ordination
• Providing targeted staff training.

The next phase will focus on turning insight into action through process review, task and finish groups, piloting changes and involving people with lived experience.

A CHC Co-Production Group will play a central role in guiding these improvements, supported by ongoing working group oversight, shared resources, and a system-wide culture of collaboration and personalisation.